The difficulty of such questions without relying on 'experience' arguments might make us want to think again about the argument from religious experience alvin plantinga, a christian philosopher, wrote a book on this subject called 'god and other minds', which pursues this line of thought. The religious experience argument posits that one can only perceive that which exists, and so god must exist because there are those that have experienced him. Explain the argument from religious experience for theism (layman) a any apparent experience of something is to be regarded as veridical unless we have sufficient reasons to the contrary. The argument from religious experience is the argument that because people have reported religious experiences of god, therefore god existsin the formal logic of philosophical theology the argument may be expressed as follows:.
Explain the argument from religious experience for theism there are many different types of religious experiences layman refers to a specific religious experience called theistic mystical experience, which is the apparent direct awareness of the presence of god. The argument from religious experience copleston introduces religious experience, not as a proof that god exists, but as a phenomenon that makes the existence of god more likely analysis. Previous index next arguments from religious experience so far we have looked at: the ontological argument the cosmological argument the teleological argument.
To some, personal religious experience is the best evidence of the existence of god to others, such emotion-based beliefs can only reflect crowd-induced illusions or personally generated delusion—each the triumph of hope over reason how could one trust that any religious experience was real and . “explain the argument from religious experience for the existence of god”30 marks expect different forms of the argument from religious experience, eg inductive argument, direct awareness, cumulative argument. First, religious experience is to be distinguished from religious feelings, in the same way that experience in general is to be distinguished from feelings in general a feeling of elation, for example, even if it occurs in a religious context, does not count in itself as a religious experience, even if the subject later comes to think that the feeling was caused by some objective reality of religious significance.
The argument from religious experience is the argument from experiences of god to the existence of god in its stronger form, this argument asserts that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and so that the ‘god’ therefore must be a god case closed in its weaker form (logically . In recent analytic philosophy of religion, one hotly debated topic is the veridicality of religious experience in this paper, i briefly trace how the argument from religious experience comes into prominence in the twentieth century this is due to the able defense of this argument by richard . The argument from religious experience is an argument for the existence of god it holds that the best explanation for religious experiences is that they constitute genuine experience or perception of a divine reality various reasons have been offered for and against accepting this contention.
The argument from religious experience is the argument from experiences of god to the existence of god in its strong form, this argument asserts that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and so that the phenomenon of religious experience demonstrates the existence of god. The argument from religious experience for the existence of god seeks to address this question the argument goes as follows: p1: if an entity is experience, then it must exist. 1 examine the strengths and weaknesses of the argument for the existence of god based on religious experience (18) 2 ‘the argument merely indicates the probability of god and this is of little value to a religious believer’. Instead, this argument moves in another direction: from the widespread fact of religious experience to the affirmation that only a divine reality can adequately explain it it is difficult to state this argument deductively.
Religious experience, argument for the existence of god arguments from religious experience show remarkable diversity, (a ) in the sorts of experience taken as data for the argument, (b ) in the structure of the inference itself, and (c ) in the alleged conclusion, whether to a vague presence, an infinite being, or the god of traditional christianity. -one way to explain the difference in accounts of religious experience is to remember that religious experience is ineffable: you can't accurately describe a religious experience so the experiencer falls back on language they use in their own culture and upbringing. The argument from religious experience experiences that are part of a religious life include the ups and downs of faith, doubt, sacrifice, and achievement we.